From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,42427d0d1bf647b1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: john@assen.demon.co.uk (John McCabe)
Subject: Re: Ada Core Technologies and Ada95 Standards
Date: 1996/05/09
Message-ID: <831662833.21285.0@assen.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 153911865
x-nntp-posting-host: assen.demon.co.uk
references: <00001a73+00002c20@msn.com> <831410273.2370.0@assen.demon.co.uk>
 <dewar.831423143@schonberg> <831590385.6539.0@assen.demon.co.uk>
 <Dr46LG.2FF@world.std.com>
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-05-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) wrote:

>In article <831590385.6539.0@assen.demon.co.uk>,
>John McCabe <john@assen.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>... It is quite clear from what is written
>>there that you believe the shared variables section of RM83 to be
>>extremely unclear, so please do not use the grammar of that section as
>>an argument defending a duff implementation, ...

>Yeah, please.

>>... especially as you were so
>>involved in the effort to clear this mess up in Ada 9X.

>- Bob

I see what you mean! Completely coincidental I assure you!

Best Regards
John McCabe <john@assen.demon.co.uk>