From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df89b5458de26ba2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ed Falis <falis@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Unsigned Longword
Date: 1999/12/11
Message-ID: <82sd1e$soq$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 559178430
References: <OF8A70EE05.EDBCEFED-ON88256843.0079C931@ray.ca>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x21.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 216.120.49.221
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Dec 11 02:31:10 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDfalis
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (Windows NT 5.0;US) Opera 3.60 [en]
Date: 1999-12-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <OF8A70EE05.EDBCEFED-ON88256843.0079C931@ray.ca>,
  comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org wrote:

.
>
> I'd like to ask this forum if there was/is a nicer way of implementing a 'true'
> Unsigned Longword?

Well, these days most compilers will support type Interfaces.Unsigned_32. 
Now the issue (for some) is Unsigned_64 ;-)

- Ed


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.