From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b12a5cee4778f63 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: GNAT & GCC performace (bad news) Date: 1999/12/11 Message-ID: <82s492$nas$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 559121768 References: <38473D90.68D8F47@acenet.com.au> <1999Dec3.103807.1@eisner> <82fgh2$mt3$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <1999Dec6.073729.1@eisner> <82hn65$a5o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <384FEBF9.5F4F6BD2@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> <82pro2$3i0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x38.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 170.1.222.94 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Dec 11 00:01:39 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , ev_remove_this_ans@evans.pgh.pa.us (Arthur Evans Jr) wrote: > Absolutely right! > > Moreover, this approach provides developers on a new target (which > already has a C compiler) immediate ability to write and test code. > If as the project develops it appears that better code efficiency > is required, they can then go the (more expensive) route of > commissioning a new target for GCC. But, in the mean time, they do > have a useful compiler for testing. > > Art Evans Of course from that point of view, it would be even nicer to have an open source solution. It would not be that hard to target GNAT to ANSI C, since many of the required transformation are already done in gigi. A nice project for someone to do! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.