From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,325a055bed62c230
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Apex vs GNAT on solaris
Date: 1999/12/10
Message-ID: <82pqr6$31e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 558701689
References: <82hiuj$74o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <82hnll$ahu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <384cfdb3.691883075@newsnew.draper.com> <82ku6s$jhi$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <384e52db.779218947@newsnew.draper.com> <82nhpr$g0l$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <384fa0a4.864668076@newsnew.draper.com> <5OQ34.29$ia1.6535@news.wenet.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Dec 10 03:08:24 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-12-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <5OQ34.29$ia1.6535@news.wenet.net>,
  "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net> wrote:
> But surely, in the case where a mature compiler defaults to
> *no* optimization, nobody should think that *any* optimization
> is suspect in that compiler -- that's just not reasonable.
>
> Mike

Well nobody is a rather fierce word :-) But I can say that in
our experience this is not a problem.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.