From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e4b2dce209393666 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Richard D Riehle Subject: Re: Business Week (12/6/99 issue) article on Software Quality Date: 1999/12/08 Message-ID: <82mlvh$mb0$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 558322248 References: <82hk54$cbc$1@nntp6.atl.mindspring.net> <82kv5j$k6p$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <384eabe7.13628242@news.netidea.com> Organization: MindSpring Enterprises X-Server-Date: 8 Dec 1999 22:26:57 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-12-08T22:26:57+00:00 List-Id: In article , Keith Thompson wrote: >That incident actually occurred, on September 9, 1947. The "bug" was >a moth in a relay of the Mark II, which was removed and pasted into >the logbook by Grace Murray Hopper. There's a photo at >. > >It's clear from the wording of the log entry, "First actual case of >bug being found", that the term "bug" was already in use. Excellent example of a "bug" as something that enters your product from outside. We find the same kind of "bug" in the form of cosmic radiation in satellites. This is a correct use of "bug." What programmers usually call a "bug" is a defect due to some mistake. That "bug" was created by us through ommission or commission. Richard Riehle