From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,325a055bed62c230
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu (David Starner)
Subject: Re: Apex vs GNAT on solaris
Date: 1999/12/07
Message-ID: <82j35q$9281@news.cis.okstate.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 557709052
References: <82hiuj$74o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <82hnll$ahu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <384cfdb3.691883075@newsnew.draper.com>
Organization: Oklahoma State University
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX)
Reply-To: dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-12-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 07 Dec 1999 12:38:16 GMT, Roger Racine <rracine@myremarq.com> wrote:
>Is it a mistake to use the default options for a compiler?

Yes. GCC defaults to fast compilation. If you want good code,
turn optimization on. It's definetly not fair to benchmark
GNAT at -O0 (the default) unless you're timing the compiler
itself. 

-- 
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
This message property of the Secret Masters. Unauthorized
duplication or reading will result in execution. Aren't
you glad nothing happens without the authorization of
the Secret Masters?