From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,325a055bed62c230
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: reason67@my-deja.com
Subject: Re: Apex vs GNAT on solaris
Date: 1999/12/07
Message-ID: <82hp0m$bkd$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 557319566
References: <82hiuj$74o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <82hk18$7up$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <82ho1n$asm$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: NetCache@www-blv-proxy4.boeing.com: Version NetApp Release
 3.4D6: Mon Aug 23 16:40:19 PDT 1999-Solaris,
 1.0 x30.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 12.13.226.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Dec 07 01:48:07 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDreason67
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.05 [en]C-Boeing Kit (Win95; I)
Date: 1999-12-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <82ho1n$asm$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:

> I would be surprised if both compilers did not simply use the
> underlying storage allocation mechanism provided by Solaris.
> Do you have any reason to think otherwise?

Nope. In fact, I am sure that is correct now that I have run my test. I
was told that Apex had problems with heap memory and at times could
cause memory leaks. This is what lead to this test. My assumption now is
someone was blaming their coding errors on the compiler. :)
---
Jeffrey S. Blatt


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.