From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,dc1fff2721602dfa
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.224.110.68 with SMTP id m4mr6419423qap.2.1359730732655;
        Fri, 01 Feb 2013 06:58:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.49.84.167 with SMTP id a7mr1148145qez.11.1359730732626; Fri,
 01 Feb 2013 06:58:52 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 k2ni4456qap.0!nntp.google.com!p13no7912756qai.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 06:58:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <an1enaFjakbU1@mid.individual.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=69.153.54.159;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.153.54.159
References: <4978d638-a04b-4561-85e9-cf6620265af2@googlegroups.com>
 <amrv6sFbs48U1@mid.individual.net> <86boc63n5d.fsf@gaheris.avalon.lan>
 <amsmtpFh274U1@mid.individual.net>
 <c81d094d-bfdc-49e7-a6af-09db13c7f6f5@googlegroups.com>
 <an1enaFjakbU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <82aa1b67-3ed9-4d27-9708-5adb5b9ecf1e@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada and string literals
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:58:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2013-02-01T06:58:52-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, February 1, 2013 3:03:38 AM UTC-6, Niklas Holsti wrote:
> On 13-02-01 02:54 , Shark8 wrote:
> 
> I guess you didn't read to the end of my post before replying.

Guilty.
I've been writing up some tutorials for Ada 2012 and, like an overexcited schoolboy, thought "I know this, I know this!" in the middle of the post.

*insert embarrassed smile*
Sorry about that.

> 
> Using Ada 2012 conditional expressions in the actual parameters works in
> this simple example, but become cumbersome (e.g. because of duplicated
> conditions and nested conditions) in more complex cases.

True, though you can somewhat mitigate that with some structuring.