From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea41e1f99bbb6556
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-05 00:47:49 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: lektu@terra.es (Juanma Barranquero)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.14p: Is GNAT.Sockets an internal unit?
Date: 5 Feb 2002 00:47:48 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <82a9a6d9.0202050047.53a129cb@posting.google.com>
References: <64it5uk1o286o33mfvavged1g03aj9to4n@4ax.com>
 <5ee5b646.0202041700.332950ab@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.22.27.249
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1012898869 21282 127.0.0.1 (5 Feb 2002 08:47:49
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Feb 2002 08:47:49 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19627
Date: 2002-02-05T08:47:49+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Sounds like a bug, perhaps you should report it!

Will do.

> Posting something here is not a bug report.

Yeah, I know. I wanted to be sure I was understanding correctly the
intended behavior of -gnatwi.

Thanks,
                                                                 
/L/e/k/t/u