From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b12a5cee4778f63 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dvdeug@x8b4e53cd. (David Starner) Subject: Re: GNAT & GCC performace (bad news) Date: 1999/12/02 Message-ID: <826prm$9aa3@news.cis.okstate.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 555975090 References: Organization: Oklahoma State University User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-12-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 02 Dec 1999 22:43:46 +0100, Harald Schmidt wrote: >this sounds really bad. Has anyone any idea why this >is so and how to solve this problem. What I was expecting, >because gnat isn't a compiler env. but a to-C(++) translator, It's not a to-C translator. The GCC compiler suite looks like ----- GNU C GCC Backend -|----- GNU Ada |----- GNU Fortran ----- GNU C++ etc not -- GNU C++ GCC Backend -- GNU C |-- GNU Ada -- GNU Fortran etc -- David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org I see no trend at all, except toward women playing mean and ugly sociopaths who are good at killing and who enjoy dark powers. Maybe it's just my friends? -- Dr. Kromm, on who plays what type of character in RPGs