From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a883dc07df0d6bb1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Decoding an octet stream Date: 1999/12/02 Message-ID: <825v5e$99j$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 555652382 References: <877lj2q36g.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> <81u247$kc3$1@hobbes2.crc.com> <821rc5$bim$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <822o4d$ehh$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <8233fm$ngf$1@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net> <3845F5DB.4535A4BF@research.canon.com.au> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x31.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Dec 02 14:19:35 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-12-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3845F5DB.4535A4BF@research.canon.com.au>, Geoff Bull wrote: > If you can produce evidence of prior art, a patent is > invalid. Yes, that's true, but the mistake people often make is to assume that prior art means something informal, like "known before", but it is much more complex and delicate, there are many litigated cases, where one would think that there was clearly prior art, in that lots of people knew about it and used it publicly, but still it does not meet the legal qualification as prior art. > This particular patent covers an idea present > in Sun's XDR. As you can see from the following, XDR > dates back to 1986, so it seems "the patent" (not being > filed until 1988) is invalid. Many patents that seem invalid to lay people who do not know patent case law well turn out to be valid in legal terms, or at least valid enough to extract settlements. P.S. Once again, I ask where is Greg, now that we are discussing something he really knows. I still find this off topic for Ada, but I hesitate to set followups to a more appropriate group, since I suspect that most of the people contributing won't know where to go :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.