From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4798cdf5e1c2b226
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.227.230 with SMTP id sd6mr2492953pbc.8.1335354008798;
        Wed, 25 Apr 2012 04:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni96699pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail
From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNADE still alive?
References: <20565278.30.1335224824186.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbvd8>
 	<82haw9gvcl.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 	<4f96acbf$0$7613$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:40:57 -0400
Message-ID: <824ns8ghti.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (windows-nt)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:W7uKgc0wtyDx/eEfS4opBoeTgHU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com
Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com
X-Trace: 8e7414f97e298e029e66109251
X-Received-Bytes: 1526
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-04-25T07:40:57-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> writes:

> On 24.04.12 14:36, Stephen Leake wrote:
>
>> <rant>
>> Why do people care if something is being "developed"?...
>> </rant>
>
> Individuals rely on collective intelligence and "collective"
> is always important, since human beings are social beings;
> a project that will make an individual appear to be a loner is not
> attractive (unless the individual wishes to be a lonesome hero
> on her way to disrupt the market).

So you are more interested in how many people are knowledgeable about
using GNADE (and are willing to share that knowledge); still not
directly related to whether it is being developed (CVS is the best
example here).

-- 
-- Stephe