From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,4e7df01d3b597a03 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.213.106 with SMTP id nr10mr11312937pbc.2.1335596699893; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:04:59 -0700 (PDT) Path: r9ni107302pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Converting a simple makefile in a GPS project. References: <428617.3.1334627550218.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynnn9> <82bompjjcc.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <20445554.1190.1335148453769.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynbi5> <82ty09gw8s.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <30582310.1752.1335499373911.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjj16> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 03:05:03 -0400 Message-ID: <824ns4e3q8.fsf@stephe-leake.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jx5UxqMBP/wVQoa4v1wMa5SongA= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com X-Trace: b2cad4f9b969be029e66116414 X-Received-Bytes: 2394 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: 2012-04-28T03:05:03-04:00 List-Id: "Rego, P." writes: >> I'd have given up on gpr and kept the makefile, since it's simpler (and >> better documented); why are you bothering with the gpr file? > > I did not find a way of using the makefiles properly in GPS without > having to configure the Build>Settings>Targets Compile/Build options > and without messing up my OS configurations on other GPS projects > (with other cross-compilers, etc); but actually I did not look for it > harder. Running the makefiles from command-line of emacs is no > problem, but I like to code using GPS stuffs, so I found that .gpr > configs are easier (however the documentation does not help so much). That's one reason I stick to Emacs :). It is true that GPS has more advanced interactive GUI stuff than Emacs Ada mode. I haven't tried it recently; I have recently tried Eclipse (for Java), and I understand it's similar. I find all that eye candy just gets in my way :). But some of the context sensitive menus are nice; a list of parameters for a subprogram is helpful (although I'm not clear how it handles overloaded programs). You should report this as a GPS bug to AdaCore. I don't know that they'll do anything about it, but they certainly won't if no one complains :). If you explicitly state that "Emacs is better for this", that might motivate them. Even better would be "Eclipse is better for this" (if you know it to be true). -- -- Stephe