From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00006d3c4735d70 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-25 14:05:53 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net (Jim Rogers) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: In-Out Parameters for functions Date: 25 Feb 2004 14:05:43 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <82347202.0402251405.2db2f3c5@posting.google.com> References: <1075390647.405841@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1075851506.238480@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <4020C947.81A6D703@0.0> <1075907239.138068@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <402232E9.3EE15B4B@0.0> <1075987360.225622@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <40236C0B.E988E003@0.0> <1077634311.254581@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.194.156.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1077746753 3621 127.0.0.1 (25 Feb 2004 22:05:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5821 Date: 2004-02-25T14:05:43-08:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake wrote in message news:... > I think Hyman has two valid points: > > 1) if the language specified left-to-right order, there would never be > a need to "kill the original smart-ass programmer" > > 2) Does anyone have a real example of a compiler taking advantage of > the evaluation order freedom to speed up a program? But how does his order of evaluation work with named notation? Is the order determined by the order of the formal parameters, or by the order of the actual parameters? In Ada it is not as easy to determine parameter order because of named notation. Jim Rogers