From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108717,ea99940253996e3e X-Google-Attributes: gid108717,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea99940253996e3e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,ea99940253996e3e X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,ea99940253996e3e X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-03 12:48:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net (Jim Rogers) Newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.programming,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Spell-checking source code (Was: ISO Studies of underscores...) Date: 3 Oct 2003 12:48:03 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <82347202.0310031148.1284a52b@posting.google.com> References: <2cfd1a4e.0309252032.3e3c0a1a@posting.google.com> <863cefjy6l.fsf@strudel.futureapps.de> <86ad8i7d1d.fsf_-_@huldreheim.huldreskog.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.194.156.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1065210483 26158 127.0.0.1 (3 Oct 2003 19:48:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 19:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.software-eng:32 comp.programming:307 comp.lang.c++:649 comp.lang.ada:166 Date: 2003-10-03T12:48:03-07:00 List-Id: "William" wrote in message news:... > Talking to myself here... I occurred to me that its syntax highlighting > makes spell checking reserved words less necessary - and the syntax > highlighting can deal with case. -Wm Even more to the point -- any compiler should be able to properly recognize reserved words. Why use another tool to check what the compiler will also check? Jim Rogers