From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ef33c33c4f98bde1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Compiler for Z80/6510
Date: 1999/11/28
Message-ID: <81putt$sa8$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 553879732
References: <NBBBJNOMKDIAJALCEFIJAEMFDFAA.rleif@rleif.com>
 <01bf38cb$be9b2b60$022a6282@dieppe>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Nov 28 01:01:50 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-11-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <01bf38cb$be9b2b60$022a6282@dieppe>,
> I'am really for a compiler optimizing my code and I want me to
> care about readability, maintenability and overall desing of
> my software. In do not want to know what going
> on behind the scene !


Fine, but (a) everyone agrees with this, and (b) this is not
relevant to the thread. The thread is not about whether it is
reasonable to write anything in assembler, it is the interesting
technical issue of whether compilers can do a better job than
expert humans writing assembler language. That's an interesting
issue, but does not have much to do with the issue of whether
software *should* be written in ASM!


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.