From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cc7bad83fb245cb3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Binding a type to a union.
Date: 1999/11/25
Message-ID: <81ignc$gb$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 552729463
References: <OF1AE825B1.88FF8CF8-ON88256832.005C894B@ray.ca>
 <383ae9f8_3@news1.prserv.net> <81f3qe$jln$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <1999Nov23.215123.1@eisner>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x40.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Nov 25 05:16:30 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-11-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1999Nov23.215123.1@eisner>,
  Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam wrote:
> In article <81f3qe$jln$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Robert Dewar
<robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:
> > In article <383ae9f8_3@news1.prserv.net>,
> >   "Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org> wrote:
> >  (pragma Unchecked_Union is GNAT-specific.)
> >
> > No it isn't!
>
> It does not seem to be in the LRM index as published by IIT
Research.
>
> Where else would one look it up ?


No one said this was a standard pragma, it is not! All I said
was that it was not GNAT specific. Look it up in the Aonix
documentation, or the GNAT documentation, or the Greenhills
documentation etc. The GNAT implementation is slightly more
restrictive than the Intermetrics one I believe.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.