From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ccbf31c901dc851
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Riyaz Mansoor" <s800032@student.uq.edu.au>
Subject: Re: defining functions
Date: 1999/11/25
Message-ID: <81i1r4$p9v$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 552742831
References: <81gthb$kej$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au> <81hbf1$6fb$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Complaints-To: news@uq.edu.au
X-Trace: bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au 943491748 25919 172.20.69.157 (25 Nov 1999
 01:02:28 GMT)
Organization: University of Queensland
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Nov 1999 01:02:28 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-11-25T01:02:28+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> No. You do not get to create your own binary operators with any series
> of random characters you choose. You are restricted to the ones the
> language provides. I was a smidge diappointed when I first figured that
> out myself.

> No. You'll have to stick to Ada/Pascal/Modula/Oberon syntax for equality
> and assignment. Sorry.
>
> But on the bright side, you'll make less compilable typos this way.

thanx TED. u really answered my question.