From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cc7bad83fb245cb3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "David Botton" <David@Botton.com>
Subject: Re: Binding a type to a union.
Date: 1999/11/23
Message-ID: <81fbv1$uo8$1@news.gate.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 552295816
References: <OF1AE825B1.88FF8CF8-ON88256832.005C894B@ray.ca>
 <383ae9f8_3@news1.prserv.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700
X-Complaints-To: abuse@gate.net
X-Trace: news.gate.net 943403809 31496 199.227.189.252 (24 Nov 1999 00:36:49
 GMT)
Organization: CyberGate, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Nov 1999 00:36:49 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-11-24T00:36:49+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Many of my bindings use the pragma and they work on non-GNAT compilers.

DB

Matthew Heaney wrote in message <383ae9f8_3@news1.prserv.net>...
  (pragma Unchecked_Union is GNAT-specific.)