From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cc7bad83fb245cb3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Binding a type to a union.
Date: 1999/11/23
Message-ID: <81f3p4$jld$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 552175615
References: <OF1AE825B1.88FF8CF8-ON88256832.005C894B@ray.ca>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x38.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Nov 23 22:17:19 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-11-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <OF1AE825B1.88FF8CF8-ON88256832.005C894B@ray.ca>,
  comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org wrote:
> The pragma comes with a long list of restrictions which
> perhaps, generally, would be undesirable.

>From an Ada point of view, the entire pragma is horribly unsafe,
and not something we want to see used in Ada code at all, so the
only legitimate use is in the interfacing context.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.