From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5705b694e07bc9d9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Bizarre anti-Ada comments surface
Date: 1999/11/23
Message-ID: <81f15u$ho8$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 552165342
References: <GMz_3.444$aj3.45269@news.wenet.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x37.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Nov 23 21:32:52 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1999-11-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <GMz_3.444$aj3.45269@news.wenet.net>,
  "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net> wrote:
> I've just finished reading and responding to some really bizarre
> anti-Ada comments over on comp.os.vxworks.  Considering my limited Ada
> experience I'm sure others in this group can provide more authoritive
> responses, so I thought I'd alert the group.  The message subject is:

I hang out there, and do try to respond appropriately to such statements
when they arise. Unfortunately I must have missed that one. In any
event, I don't think your response was any less authoratative or
reasoned than mine.

--
T.E.D.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.