From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5705b694e07bc9d9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ada2001 <ada2001@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Bizarre anti-Ada comments surface
Date: 1999/11/23
Message-ID: <81esiv$e73$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 552143131
References: <GMz_3.444$aj3.45269@news.wenet.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x24.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.175.225.5
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Nov 23 20:14:26 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDada2001
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.51 [en]C-CCK-MCD (WinNT; U)
Date: 1999-11-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I think Mike made a pretty good response.  I've also responded to two
ignorant anti-Ada comments in comp.lang.misc and comp.programming over
the last month.  I suspect that battling Ada misinformation in all of
Usenet could be a full time job for someone.  Its good that many c.l.a.
participants also participate in other newsgroups and respond as
appropriate.

F. Britt Snodgrass


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.