From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY,PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2f51b5a1324ec613
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: ADA 95 C++ and Solaris
Date: 1999/11/22
Message-ID: <81bppg$4k3$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 551648805
References: <3831644C.6CFBCA79@animaths.com>
 <x7vpux5oxgd.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk> <slrn83g0e3.cr.gisle@kondor.ii.uib.no>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Nov 22 16:08:21 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-11-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <slrn83g0e3.cr.gisle@kondor.ii.uib.no>,
  gisle@kondor.ii.uib.no (Gisle S�lensminde) wrote:
> If the code is compiled with a different c++ compiler, you can
> generally not expect it to be compatible with neither g++ nor
> GNAT c++ interfacing.

The GNAT c++ interfacing scheme is compiler indepedent, and
specifically designed to be easily tailorable to any C++
compiler. It has been used successfully with the SGI Delta
C++ compiler, which uses quite different name mangling and
data layouts from g++


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.