From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,103b407e8b68350b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-04 18:49:06 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.stealth.net!news.stealth.net!news-xfer.cox.net!p01!news2.central.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Anybody in US using ADA ? One silly idea..
References: <VtlQ9.42144$%3.10762066@twister.neo.rr.com>
 <C900921B7A3FDDD4.5FD752FF5D42F9AF.349D2214D482463F@lp.airnews.net>
 <autmq3$4oe$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> <3E147D79.2070703@cogeco.ca>
 <BA3A535D.177F%yaldnifw@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <ba162549.0301030124.237c7a7e@posting.google.com>
 <4519e058.0301031434.51a0c880@posting.google.com>
 <ba162549.0301040053.1e7dbedc@posting.google.com>
 <wmFR9.111225$Y86.101474@news2.central.cox.net>
 <zmHR9.253680$a8.123558@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>
In-Reply-To: <zmHR9.253680$a8.123558@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <81NR9.112823$Y86.60750@news2.central.cox.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 02:47:32 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.12.51.201
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net
X-Trace: news2.central.cox.net 1041734852 68.12.51.201 (Sat,
 04 Jan 2003 21:47:32 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 21:47:32 EST
Organization: Cox Communications
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32553
Date: 2003-01-05T02:47:32+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hillel Y. Sims wrote:
> "Ted Dennison" <dennison@telepath.com> wrote in message
> news:wmFR9.111225$Y86.101474@news2.central.cox.net...
> 
>>That's why rule #1 in the Mozilla C++ portability
>>guide is "Don't use C++ templates". (see
>>http://www.mozilla.org/hacking/portable-cpp.htmll#dont_use_templates)
>>
> 
> 
> Why should anyone care about coding guidelines from a failed project though?
> :-)

A good point, but I'm not sure how it relates to Mozilla. I've been 
using it for my main browser for over a year now, and personally think 
its about the best thing since sliced bread.

If you don't have the latest alpha with the baesean spam filtering, you 
are really missing out too. I get about 10-20 spams a day at this 
address, since I don't believe in email address munging. That's *after* 
the filtering my ISP does which catches about 40 a day (I'm *not* 
joking. My ISP caught 37 for January 3). But I almost never have to look 
at a spam any more. I think in the last week Mozilla let about 2 slip 
through, and hit one false positive.