From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,932ab97db73b73f4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Ada lives?
Date: 1999/11/20
Message-ID: <814pce$hau$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 550717326
References: <Ox9Z3.764$o4.755@news.indigo.ie> <3835B21C.FFEF5C51@averstar.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x32.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Nov 20 00:18:25 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-11-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3835B21C.FFEF5C51@averstar.com>,
  Tucker Taft <stt@averstar.com> wrote:
> In desktop applications, Ada is a negligent player.
                                    ^^^^^^^^^

nice typo Tuck, though I expect there are some would be
marketing experts around who would agree :-) :-)



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.