From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,28b389d4503cb555
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: generic package dilemma
Date: 1999/11/19
Message-ID: <81449o$1fh$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 550603751
References: <80u48b$ghr$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au> <3832e27f_1@news1.prserv.net>
 <3832E75D.5B1BA719@mail.com> <383319e8_4@news1.prserv.net>
 <3833F615.5AD7166C@mail.com> <383442e1_1@news1.prserv.net>
 <383510EA.9DFEE8B6@mail.com> <383569db_2@news1.prserv.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x38.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Nov 19 18:18:37 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-11-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <383569db_2@news1.prserv.net>,
  "Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org> wrote:
> But you seem to advocate only a conditional application of
> this guideline.  When specifically do you recommend using
> Elaborate_All, versus not needing to bother?


It's really a rule rather than a guideline, at least for new
code, although GNAT will indeed provide the necessary implicit
Elaborate_All statements if you leave them out!

The rule is simple, if you instantiate a generic from within
elaboration code, then you must use a pragma Elaborate_All
on the generic.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.