From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,de5dfd6df880dd3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Bugs or Mistakes?
Date: 1999/11/19
Message-ID: <812p3s$2ei$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 550404792
References: <19991112202656.2368.rocketmail@web216.mail.yahoo.com>
 <80i9la$i9e$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <3832E75B.2B6E7E1E@pwfl.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x38.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Nov 19 06:01:33 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-11-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3832E75B.2B6E7E1E@pwfl.com>,
  condicma@pwflcom wrote:
> Perhaps "design defects" is a more accurate description of
> what we commonly call "bugs"

I don't like lumping all bugs into design flaws. To me a design
flaw is quite a different beast from a typo introduced during
implementation, and it is useful in preventing, finding,
tracking, ande removing bugs to make the distinction.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.