From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bdd30c42c9993fa3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: off-topic ...
Date: 1999/11/19
Message-ID: <812o3b$1nh$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 550399462
References: <ehIY3.7063$7m.380540@newshog.newsread.com>
 <38336E5A.D744214E@australia.boeing.com> <8113an$pq8$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x38.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Nov 19 05:44:11 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-11-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <8113an$pq8$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:

> ...or perhaps actually implementing the implementation advice.

What is it with T.E.D. and implementation advice, have you
had bad experience with a vendor not implementing the advice,
or is it just a theoretical hobby horse?


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.