From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.68.219.226 with SMTP id pr2mr11238699pbc.4.1408900577583;
        Sun, 24 Aug 2014 10:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.36.234 with SMTP id p97mr378qgp.14.1408900577499; Sun,
 24 Aug 2014 10:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!r2no6362098igi.0!news-out.google.com!j6ni7969qas.0!nntp.google.com!i13no2513310qae.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 10:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <64ff459f-98c0-4fab-bcdd-d9fafe3311e6@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.178.36.13;
 posting-account=bDZo8goAAADwRO71ouDFRMCIZ96XBCK3
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.178.36.13
References: <64ff459f-98c0-4fab-bcdd-d9fafe3311e6@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <81012988-f550-4a82-88eb-7bdbd05a3789@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: is getting OpenGL to work with Ada a lost cause?
From: gdotone@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 17:16:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21888
Date: 2014-08-24T10:16:17-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

newbie question:

can the opengl specification be implemented in ADA?

would it be faster or slower comparing such an implementation in C,
well would it necessary have to be much slower?

is there an ada compiler that generates assembly directly, not using C then assembler?