From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3b98a6d739306a7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Andrew" <mysig@fast.net>
Subject: Re: ada in australia, to the mystery emailer
Date: 1999/11/16
Message-ID: <80sts7$9hr$1@news5.fast.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 549508542
References: <382E91FF.621BB2DB@interact.net.au> <382F2310.260C22C@boeing.com>
 <382FC770.81CA88A8@interact.net.au> <80qbv6$901$1@news5.fast.net>
 <38312B69.CD29EC77@interact.net.au>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6000
X-Complaints-To: abuse@fast.net
X-Trace: news5.fast.net 942799559 9787 209.92.15.227 (17 Nov 1999 00:45:59
 GMT)
Organization: FASTNET(R) - Business and Personal Internet Solutions
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Nov 1999 00:45:59 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-11-17T00:45:59+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Comanche software is written in Ada. And yes it is complex and it's going to
get more complex. It's going to be awesome. Actually, Comanche avionics is
complex than F-22s. Helicopter is much harder to fly then a plane.

Comanche 3 (Novalogic) is pretty cool.


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew


"G" <Dizzy@interact.net.au> wrote in message
news:38312B69.CD29EC77@interact.net.au...
>
>
>
>
> > What sort of Comanche simulation are you working on ? Comanche is still
in
> > development. Lots of changes coming down.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Andrew
>
> Hey... well I am just doing a simple analysis.  I know the Comanche is
still
> under development.  I have been playing Novalogic's cool-o-rama Comanche
PC
> flight simulator for several years now.  This got me interested in looking
at
> the online (freely available) specifications for the RAH66.
>
> I am sort of killing two birds with one stone because I am learning how to
> construct
> technical specifications with shockwave Flash - I am working on a
presentation
> for the RAH66.  So, this gives me a lot of time thinking about the various
> systems and subsystems.  I am using this to learn how to weave together a
> variety of elements into
> a simple representation in a package or three which can be imported into a
> simple simulation program.  As for the real aircraft, it has some 1.2
million
> lines of code, about 83% of which is Ada - rivalling the F22 which has the
odd
> hundred thousand or more lines, if memory serves me.  So.. consider my
> simulation as something less than that... by oh... three or four
light-years
> distance. :-)
>
> I study philosophy and ontology (and then some), or have done, and these
sorts
> of mental gymnastics required in type casting, etc. are wonderful.
>
> There is just so much damn technology in the rah66 that I may as well be
> simulating a traffic helicopter for my own current ability - but the
Comanche is
> such a beautiful thing... so that keeps me inspired.  I am more interested
in
> the patterns of organisation required to simulate than simulation itself,
> because I have a helluva lot to learn.
>
> OK
> :-)
> -Graeme.
>