From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,577c9f9c0cdd76d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
Subject: Re: Confusing language,
 was Re: Help help.. please.i am totaly new in ada programing
Date: 1999/11/15
Message-ID: <80pbr8$7ep$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 548856029
References: <7vqgs2$lcc$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <Ph8U3.1221$933.40473@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>
 <38233108.F3540F0@ebox.tninet.se> <806716$i6c2@ftp.kvaerner.com>
 <807109$8m0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38270DC7.86553BB1@pwfl.com>
 <wcc1z9zk5ov.fsf@world.std.com> <38285C60.B3E2D2BC@pwfl.com>
 <809u91$3ik$1@nntp1.atl.mindspring.net> <wcc90462gqw.fsf@world.std.com>
 <80djd2$48o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <382C40FA.248E6840@mitre.org>
 <80ival$og$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <80p61s$2sa$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x36.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Nov 15 16:19:57 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-11-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <80p61s$2sa$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:
> Isn't it already quite inefficient in that writing a large
> composite involves dispatching to the write routine for each
> and every element?

Only if each and every element is itself a tagged type. In the
normal case, GNAT at least will generate the output for
composites inline in quite an efficient manner, have a look
at the code (you need to turn inlining on of course!)

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.