From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,577c9f9c0cdd76d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Confusing language, was Re: Help help.. please.i am totaly new in ada programing Date: 1999/11/13 Message-ID: <80ival$og$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 548028759 References: <7vqgs2$lcc$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38233108.F3540F0@ebox.tninet.se> <806716$i6c2@ftp.kvaerner.com> <807109$8m0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38270DC7.86553BB1@pwfl.com> <38285C60.B3E2D2BC@pwfl.com> <809u91$3ik$1@nntp1.atl.mindspring.net> <80djd2$48o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <382C40FA.248E6840@mitre.org> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x27.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Nov 13 06:09:28 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-11-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <382C40FA.248E6840@mitre.org>, "Robert I. Eachus" wrote: > Streams should value portability over speed I strongly disagree in two contexts: 1. People often use stream_io expecting efficient direct binary I/O of e.g. records. To introduce substantial inefficiencies would be a severe perturbation. 2. For homogenous distributed applications, the efficiency of streams is critical in the performance of remote procedure calls. > Or maybe we need multiple predefined stream types with > different characteristics. That's a much better thought in my opinion. We need a way of specifying default stream methods Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.