From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d6f33a5d75c89f0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: The press strikes again...
Date: 1999/11/12
Message-ID: <80hahe$q2c$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 547752042
References: <80er1v$nj$1@news.ime.net> <382AEF3D.9DB18975@pwfl.com>
 <80f0i6$2hu$1@news.ime.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x30.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Nov 12 15:08:34 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-11-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <80f0i6$2hu$1@news.ime.net>,
  "Steve O'Neill" <smoneill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The statement makes it sound like somehow or other Ada is
inadequate for
> doing the job.
>
> And, of course, all those more popular languages are perfect
for it.  Huh?


The trouble with a thread like this is that everyone is
preaching to the converted, and the original sinner won't even
get to hear the reactions. It is a good idea in such a case if
as many people as possible can take the effort to complain to
the originator of the incorrect comment. Preferably try to do
this in a constructive manner (it does not help to send messages
to people saying they are silly idiots in a PR context, even if
we do it occasionally in technical discussions on CLA :-) :-)


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.