From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d6f33a5d75c89f0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Steve O'Neill" Subject: Re: The press strikes again... Date: 1999/11/11 Message-ID: <80f0i6$2hu$1@news.ime.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 547382592 References: <80er1v$nj$1@news.ime.net> <382AEF3D.9DB18975@pwfl.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Complaints-To: news@news.harvard.net X-Trace: news.ime.net 942343558 2622 207.180.77.26 (11 Nov 1999 18:05:58 GMT) Organization: none whatsoever X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Nov 1999 18:05:58 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-11-11T18:05:58+00:00 List-Id: Marin Condic wrote in message news:382AEF3D.9DB18975@pwfl.com... > Steve O'Neill wrote: > > > "Another problem with replacing all 1553 with Fibre Channel is software > > compatibility, says George Meares, vice president of research and > > development at VMIC. Currently there are neither Fibre Channel devices > > designed to work with the Ada programming language,, (sic) nor is there any > > interest, he adds." > > The dumb part about this statement is that *nobody* designs a device to work with a programming language. Exactly. Just a stupid statement - but one from a VP of R&D of a company with a rather large interest/influence in the VME marketplace. He should know better. And then the fact that it is directed at just a single language makes it even more interesting (like, what's the point of this statement?). > If what they meant was that nobody has build any commercially available Ada software to control this device - Perhaps his particular product but, like I said, I know of efforts with other devices. He also should clarify what type of Fibre Channel he's talking about. Is he talking of FC in a network application or in a storage device application. These are quite different and I doubt if you will find much use of Ada in device drivers for storage devices. > The statement makes it sound like somehow or other Ada is inadequate for doing the job. And, of course, all those more popular languages are perfect for it. Huh? Steve