From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,57f8540942f8e060 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!x22g2000yqx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Initialization and Finalization of limited object "returned" by a function Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:49:57 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <80ccb0df-0aa3-4068-a9f5-eace40babba6@x22g2000yqx.googlegroups.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.66.190.112 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1265950197 3912 127.0.0.1 (12 Feb 2010 04:49:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: x22g2000yqx.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.66.190.112; posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9156 Date: 2010-02-11T20:49:57-08:00 List-Id: On 11 f=E9v, 18:40, Adam Beneschan wrote: > But more simply, as I understand it: (1) When you have an extended > return, the return object is used as the anonymous object that holds > the function result at the point of the function call, so it's not > finalized until the caller is done with the anonymous object; and (2) > when the object is built in place, the anonymous object "mutates into" > the new object and is not finalized (7.6(17.7/3)). =A0So yes, no > finalization should be done until X goes out of scope. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0-- Adam So yes, no finalization should be done until X goes out of scope : second confirmation.