From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a24:2c4d:: with SMTP id i74mr6219398iti.12.1546774254585; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 03:30:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6f14:: with SMTP id n20mr1193258otq.2.1546774254335; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 03:30:54 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.166.215.MISMATCH!k10no536336itk.0!news-out.google.com!v71ni521ita.0!nntp.google.com!k10no536331itk.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2019 03:30:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.168.19.89; posting-account=O_NgcgoAAABs6pgCjroQBmOBL5ZZGPUc NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.168.19.89 References: <2a6929c5-72fa-4d84-953a-44ea4597ab38@googlegroups.com> <9e6b4219-d6ba-4c89-814d-5ea6e48ed8ea@googlegroups.com> <9179093f-4765-47a9-9dc6-147c9d7d6c56@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <809a445d-cf73-4525-a732-67dbf24e8394@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: class wide iterable (and indexable) From: George Shapovalov Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 11:30:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55216 Date: 2019-01-06T03:30:54-08:00 List-Id: On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 11:19:17 AM UTC+1, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > It was and is fiercely opposed all the time! But you and many others agree that its a good idea. There is that expression, that old theories do not get overturned, rather t= hey die out with their hosts (I think it was first said in Physics, circa 1= 920-30s, during that Quantum discussion period, but I am now across so many= disciplines, I cannot be sure). So, if we just outlive them.. :) > (I have a conspiracy theory. All is because the keyword "interface" will= =20 > not need to be reserved anymore! (:-)) How so? Tagged types allow this, and both "type" and "tagged" are reserved = words. Besides, if that would be a corner issue, the opposition could be pl= acated by proposing to keep it reserved by some mandate :). George