From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,16e3a8dd4f3ab3f3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: JP Thornley Subject: Re: Elaboration order Date: 1996/03/26 Message-ID: <809029930wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 144412612 x-nntp-posting-host: diphi.demon.co.uk references: <314701A1.469D@lfwc.lockheed.com> <314D2E1C.5C72@lfwc.lockheed.com> <4in4am$klb@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <4inpiv$alk@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com> <4ip58c$gqo@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com> x-mail2news-path: relay-4.mail.demon.net!post.demon.co.uk!diphi.demon.co.uk organization: None reply-to: jpt@diphi.demon.co.uk newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-03-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: (in response to a post about the use of subsets) > > An interesting question for JP is how closely the subset corresponds > to the built in notion of pragma Preelaborate in Ada 95. A humble user replies: If Robert thinks this is an interesting question, which I take to mean 'not having any immediately obvious answer', then I'm certainly not going to attempt to come up with the definitive one :-) (Isn't that what academics and tool suppliers are for?) Phil Thornley -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | JP Thornley EMail jpt@diphi.demon.co.uk | | aka phil.thornley@bae.co.uk (but the .co doesn't | | have newsgroup access so I'm doing this from home) | ------------------------------------------------------------------------