From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,971598a9377a949a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: CPU recommendations from an Ada perspective? Date: 1999/11/08 Message-ID: <8074vf$bv2$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 545977779 References: X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x33.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Nov 08 18:32:15 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-11-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , "Mike Silva" wrote: > I'm reluctant to ask this question because it's so vague at this point, but > my curiosity has won out. I'd like to hear any recommendations for (or > against) those 32 bit CPU families which are supported by good Ada tools. There are really a lot of choices here. Just looking at the GNAT world, we have customers doing embedded programming using all of the following chips ia32 i960 ARC mips alpha m68k ppc and I may well have forgotten some. At this stage you can probably choose the hardware based on the application requirements rather than development environment requirements (other vendors also support multiple targets). I am assuming that you are talking general purpose microprocessors here. If you move into specialized areas like DSP's, then you need to do more research! Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.