From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7684e927a2475d0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.volia.net!newsfeed.utanet.at!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed02.chello.at!news.hispeed.ch.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-Id: <8070017.daGkiQV3ME@linux1.krischik.com>
From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: can one build commercial applications with latest gnat and other
 licenses related questions...
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:59:33 +0200
References: <tLmlg.119263$dW3.82693@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>
 <449660f0$0$11077$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
 <jowtbdcubc.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <1150717184.087134.177850@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <e7f7t6$qie$1@online.de>
 <1151050924.969806.284410@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
 <e7h852$7h0$1@online.de> <jccum3-trl.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <e7j2i7$4vl$1@online.de> <i0lvm3-h59.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <okmzc2rank.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <m2odwggc1m.fsf@grendel.local>
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@hispeed.ch
Organization: hispeed.ch
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.218.119.160 (80.218.119.160)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:15:12 +0200
X-Trace: 40a2544a00810f57fd20527082
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5039
Date: 2006-06-26T17:59:33+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Simon Wright wrote:

> M E Leypold <development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de>
> writes:
> 
>> But the FSF, after all, has nothing todo with the GPL-releases of Gnat.
> 
> Quite a lot of the sources of the GNAT runtime say (c) FSF. Not that
> you can place any reliance on that, of course.

The GNAT sources themself are not the problem as gcc 4.1.1 is pretty good as
well. It's the other libraries which AdaCore supplies.

And a little reminder: They are all separate products at AdaCore. If your
pay up your $/� 15.000 then you get one year/five programmer support for
the compiler only. No ASIS, No Florist, No PolyORB, no XML/Ada - they all
cost extra.

Martin
-- 
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com