From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d311338eabd7ca93 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.68.238.198 with SMTP id vm6mr240526pbc.3.1328128318260; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:31:58 -0800 (PST) Path: lh20ni249651pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!do4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Gautier write-only Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Compiler business prospects Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:31:57 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <804d257a-5656-47a1-a18a-0689f4775ff0@do4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> References: <4f27e278$0$6549$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <12716838.1333.1328020580723.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prhq14> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.203.211.202 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1328128318 4990 127.0.0.1 (1 Feb 2012 20:31:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: do4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.203.211.202; posting-account=gRqrnQkAAAAC_02ynnhqGk1VRQlve6ZG User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HNKUARELSC X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.77 Safari/535.7,gzip(gfe) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-02-01T12:31:57-08:00 List-Id: On 1 f=E9v, 13:24, Erich wrote: > As a newbie who has started to appreciate Ada (after an initial > painful learning phase) I'd say that Ada doesn't need another compiler > but rather an *affordable* cross-platform GUI toolkit that can be used > for the development of commercial software. > > By affordable I mean 100$ to 300$. I would love to use Ada for larger > standalone GUI applications but the main choices QtAda and GtkAda are > simply out of question for a hobby shareware developer like me. :( If you want to program on Windows only, you have a nice toolkit here http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnavi/ for 0$. You can make standalone executables (0 DLL!). GWindows is used in freeware and business applications, so why not shareware as well ? _________________________ Gautier's Ada programming http://gautiersblog.blogspot.com/search/label/Ada NB: follow the above link for a valid e-mail address