From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.31.189.201 with SMTP id n192mr7920285vkf.87.1505233851828; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:30:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.36.80.78 with SMTP id m75mr6073itb.2.1505233851788; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!q8no2913265qtb.0!news-out.google.com!p6ni1246itp.0!nntp.google.com!127no405438itw.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:30:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.113.16.86; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.113.16.86 References: <915874b5-52c0-4aa8-9023-82fddedb816f@googlegroups.com> <323ae5e6-f2ce-4a15-b874-906a670f331c@googlegroups.com> <35e49f52-16da-4f1a-b2e3-b8d07d736a0d@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <800285a3-22de-4b22-a0bf-afc53bc1c1c6@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Community Input for the Maintenance and Revision of the Ada Programming Language From: Shark8 Injection-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:30:51 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Body-CRC: 2732174855 X-Received-Bytes: 1829 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48066 Date: 2017-09-12T09:30:51-07:00 List-Id: On Tuesday, September 12, 2017 at 4:07:27 AM UTC-6, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > > No DB bindings I know deploy bounded-length strings. Isn't that a failing of those bindings? (Just like we could have a thin C-binding which used return codes.)