From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 4f1905883f,40783f7f814400c9 X-Google-Attributes: gid4f1905883f,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.octanews.net!indigo.octanews.net!auth.beige.octanews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Sender: phr2009-nospam@ruckus.brouhaha.com From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.functional,comp.lang.c++,comp.programming Subject: Re: Alternatives to C: ObjectPascal, Eiffel, Ada or Modula-3? References: <2009a75f-63e7-485e-9d9f-955e456578ed@v37g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <0bdf3c02-0565-40e2-95cc-c7f5eb546313@2g2000prl.googlegroups.com> Date: 29 Jul 2009 19:48:37 -0700 Message-ID: <7xmy6mzy0q.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> Organization: Nightsong/Fort GNOX User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Jul 2009 21:49:15 CDT X-Complaints-To: abuse@octanews.net X-Original-Bytes: 1481 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.scheme:6185 comp.lang.ada:7432 comp.lang.functional:2538 comp.lang.c++:48586 comp.programming:12141 Date: 2009-07-29T21:49:15-05:00 List-Id: fft1976 writes: > > � Where'd you get that idea? > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=gnat&box=1 Given that Ada is such a verbose language, the generally smaller source sizes of the Ada programs suggests that they weren't optimized very carefully. I know that some C, Java, and functional language users treat the shootouts fairly competitively and tune their code carefully, but I don't know if the Ada users are the same way. Ada is unfortunately kind of a niche language these days.