From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-24 12:59:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!sfo2-feed1.news.algx.net!allegiance!news-out.spamkiller.net!propagator-la!news-in-la.newsfeeds.com!news-in.superfeed.net!dax.net!juliett.dax.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Grace and Maps (was Re: Development process in the Ada community) References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de> <3CBAFFEE.2080708@snafu.de> <4519e058.0204171036.6f0a7394@posting.google.com> <3CBDD795.4060706@snafu.de> <4519e058.0204180800.44fac012@posting.google.com> <3CBF0341.8020406@mail.com> <4519e058.0204190529.559a47ae@posting.google.com> <3CC1C6B3.6060306@telepath.com> <3CC21747.5000501@telepath.com> <4519e058.0204220534.2eb33730@posting.go <3CC48F34.5A474E0F@boeing.com> <3CC49C50.485AE213@san.rr.com> <3CC4B5C0.4D16077C@acm.org> <3CC4E9DA.E02BE0DA@san.rr.com> <7vznzukhzf.fsf@vlinux.voxelvision.no> <3CC5B161.C719C5D8@san.rr.com> <7vg01lwaku.fsf@vlinux.voxelvision.no> <3CC6B932.75C468E1@san.rr.com> <7vbsc9w367.fsf@vlinux.voxelvision.no> <3CC6CED0.C5E203F9@san.rr.com> <7v3cxkx57y.fsf@vlinux.voxelvision.no> From: Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen Message-ID: <7vpu0ovpga.fsf@vlinux.voxelvision.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:58:30 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.216.12.150 X-Complaints-To: abuse@tele2.no X-Trace: juliett.dax.net 1019678310 193.216.12.150 (Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:58:30 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:58:30 MET DST Organization: Tele2 Norway AS Public Access Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23081 Date: 2002-04-24T19:58:30+00:00 List-Id: Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen writes: > > Neither is a predefined relational operator for the array likely to work. > > According to my admittedly rusty memory, the relational operators are Should have been *ordering operators*, of course. > only defined for scalar types and discrete array types, so I cannot > see how you can avoid defining your own for record types. So trees > have the same problem, really. >