From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b69d2b87c02b5151
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: arnold@nospam.com (Stephen Arnold)
Subject: Re: Numerical exceptions not raised properly?
Date: 1999/11/01
Message-ID: <7vkuk4$5pr@journal.concentric.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 543228855
References: <7vkgnl$u5@chronicle.concentric.net>
 <7hkT3.224$cn1.1641@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>
Organization: ENSCO Inc.
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-11-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7hkT3.224$cn1.1641@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>, tmoran@bix.com wrote:

>>From the Gnat User's Guide:
>"-gnato
>   Enable other checks, not normally enabled by default, including
>   numeric overflow checking, ..."
>The Gnat compiler defaults to no checking in your program.  If you want
>Ada 95 behavior, you must use the -gnato compilation option.

Thanks; I guess I should try reading the manual once in a while... 8-)

Steve