From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,30e3597af28a3026 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Simple algorithmic question I hope :-) Date: 1999/11/01 Message-ID: <7viqum$3bd$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 542809252 References: <7uuuba$8s4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <19991025071337.29192.00000857@ng-fa1.aol.com> <7v255q$eth$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7va4ns$898$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7vhirl$92q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7vhrs6$79q1@news.cis.okstate.edu> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x37.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Nov 01 01:38:29 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-11-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7vhrs6$79q1@news.cis.okstate.edu>, dvdeug@x8b4e53cd. (David Starner) wrote: > The name of the language is both FORTRAN & Fortran. FORTRAN is applied > to the versions <= 77. Fortran is applied to the versions >= 90. Well I was of course referring to the most recent version. Of course Fortran is really odd, both the 77 and 90 standards from ANSI are valid at the same time, a very peculiar situation reflecting an inability to get a real consensus that F90 represented *the* direction in which Fortran development should go. Does someone know if the ISO standard suffers the same schizophrenia? Normally there can be only one ISO standard for a language (Ada 83 is no longer an ISO standardized language). The Fortran community that I know these days typically spells the language in the modern style Fortran, rather than in the old style FORTRAN. COBOL though is almost always thus spelled in the COBOL community. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.