From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,30e3597af28a3026 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dvdeug@x8b4e53cd. (David Starner) Subject: Re: Simple algorithmic question I hope :-) Date: 1999/10/31 Message-ID: <7vhrs6$79q1@news.cis.okstate.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 542783702 References: <7uuuba$8s4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <19991025071337.29192.00000857@ng-fa1.aol.com> <7v255q$eth$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7va4ns$898$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7vhirl$92q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Organization: Oklahoma State University User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-10-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 14:14:14 GMT, Robert Dewar wrote: >In article <7va4ns$898$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, > Ted Dennison wrote: >> languages he knows about (most likely, FORTRAN and COBOL). >> That means he >> is suffering under the misapprehension listed above. > >Gosh Ted, I hope you know that the name of the language is >Fortran, and not FORTRAN (you know the old saying about >stones and glass houses etc.) :-) The name of the language is both FORTRAN & Fortran. FORTRAN is applied to the versions <= 77. Fortran is applied to the versions >= 90. -- David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org