From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,577c9f9c0cdd76d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Help help.. please.i am totaly new in ada programing Date: 1999/10/31 Message-ID: <7vhhq5$8k3$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 542687937 References: <7vbtof$de9$1@oceanite.cybercable.fr> <38199224_3@news1.prserv.net> <3819A44A.9F5E6B97@maths.unine.ch> <3819F415.D903183B@mbox5.singnet.com.sg> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x40.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Oct 31 13:56:21 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-10-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3819F415.D903183B@mbox5.singnet.com.sg>, ps750@mbox5.singnet.com.sg wrote: > I remember Jim Hopper mentioning recently that GNAT doesn't > work with LinuxPPC because of GCC problems. I must say that in our experiments with LinuxPPC/GNAT, we have not found gcc problems to be an issue, we of course use the patched version of 2.8.1 that is standard for GNAT (you definitely will get into trouble if you try to use gcc 2.95, or, even worse, earlier versions of egcs). Still I agree, the gcc 3.0 merge will be welcome here! Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.