From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,30e3597af28a3026
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dvdeug@x8b4e53cd. (David Starner)
Subject: Re: Simple algorithmic question I hope :-)
Date: 1999/10/29
Message-ID: <7vc9kt$9281@news.cis.okstate.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 542082996
References: <7uuuba$8s4$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <19991025071337.29192.00000857@ng-fa1.aol.com> <7v255q$eth$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <wccg0yzb1v3.fsf@world.std.com> <slrn81bp1a.1bb.aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk>
 <7va4ns$898$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3818BDC9.D8CF1D3B@callnetuk.com>
 <7vc9f4$oct$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Organization: Oklahoma State University
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-10-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 29 Oct 1999 14:03:16 GMT, Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:
>In article <3818BDC9.D8CF1D3B@callnetuk.com>,
>  Nick Roberts <nickroberts@callnetuk.com> wrote:
>> Ted Dennison wrote:
>> > ...
>> > languages he knows about (most likely, FORTRAN and COBOL). That
>means he
>> > ...
>>
>> That should be ForTran, actually.
>
>Yeah. And in all fairness, I believe they prefer it capitalized
>"Fortran" theese days (probably for the same reasons I outlined before).

Technically, FORTRAN 77 and previous are all spelled FORTRAN. Fortran 90
and later are Fortran.

--
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org