From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e80a1497a689d8a5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "David Botton" Subject: Re: Ada and GC (Was Re: Ammo-zilla) Date: 1999/10/29 Message-ID: <7vc3v5$1888$1@news.gate.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 542035698 References: <38120FAF.945ADD7D@hso.link.com> <7uutgd$87h$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <19991024.18033546@db3.max5.com> <38189268.43EB150F@mail.earthlink.net> <86ogdjtdwz.fsf@ppp-115-70.villette.club-internet.fr> <3818D4F0.92FC4DC9@mail.earthlink.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Complaints-To: abuse@gate.net X-Trace: news.gate.net 941200165 41224 199.227.189.169 (29 Oct 1999 12:29:25 GMT) Organization: CyberGate, Inc. NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Oct 1999 12:29:25 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-10-29T12:29:25+00:00 List-Id: I have found many times that GC can be unacceptable do to unpredictable delays even on non-embedded, real-time and safety critical systems. Go explain to a power user of large Java programs why they have to occasionally wait to regain usable control of the application do to GC crunching. (I believe this had a part in the demise of Corel's Java Office Suite. Applix just uses Java like an X terminal and does the real work off site.) David Botton Vladimir Olensky wrote in message ... (not embedded ,real-time and safety critical where >unpredictable >delays caused by GC are unacceptable).