From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,30e3597af28a3026 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Simple algorithmic question I hope :-) Date: 1999/10/26 Message-ID: <7v5bpd$pua$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 540911323 References: <7uuuba$8s4$1@nnrp1.deja.com><19991025071337.29192.00000857@ng-fa1.aol.com><7v255q$eth$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x22.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Oct 26 22:59:57 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-10-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , "Vladimir Olensky" wrote: > Could you imagine error message or warning something like this: > with ADA.Text_IO; > >>>Warning: Please, call me Ada if you want me to work > for you > It is easy to imagine :-) in -gnatg mode (the mode we use internally at ACT to enforce all sorts of style rules), GNAT will say: 1. with ADA.Text_IO; | >>> (style) bad identifier casing, should be "Ada" This actually is a consistency check, and reflects our rule that all identifiers must have the same case as the defining occurrence which in this case is of course spelled properly! Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.